<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Silicon Valley Web Guild &#8211; Advanced Search Marketing Part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pleasantonwebdesignblog.com/2007/01/silicon-valley-web-guild-advanced-search-marketing-part-1.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pleasantonwebdesignblog.com/2007/01/silicon-valley-web-guild-advanced-search-marketing-part-1.html?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=silicon-valley-web-guild-advanced-search-marketing-part-1</link>
	<description>Information on Web design, technology, and culture from my vantage point here in Pleasanton, California.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 15:18:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troy</title>
		<link>http://pleasantonwebdesignblog.com/2007/01/silicon-valley-web-guild-advanced-search-marketing-part-1.html/comment-page-1#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 22:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pleasantonwebdesign.tpdevspace.com/?p=108#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Not many, and I was a bit surprised that they weren&#039;t removed. I&#039;m guessing it was because the sites were for established businesses. Something more spammy probably wouldn&#039;t be so lucky. So, you&#039;re right, there may be some discretion by Yahoo to keep relevent links for the good of he directory, even if they aren&#039;t paid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not many, and I was a bit surprised that they weren&#8217;t removed. I&#8217;m guessing it was because the sites were for established businesses. Something more spammy probably wouldn&#8217;t be so lucky. So, you&#8217;re right, there may be some discretion by Yahoo to keep relevent links for the good of he directory, even if they aren&#8217;t paid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mbradbury</title>
		<link>http://pleasantonwebdesignblog.com/2007/01/silicon-valley-web-guild-advanced-search-marketing-part-1.html/comment-page-1#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>mbradbury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 21:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pleasantonwebdesign.tpdevspace.com/?p=108#comment-19</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m interested to know how many of these sites you have listed with Yahoo and then not renewed without them removing you.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I mean, it would make sense to keep you if they want to have a big and relevant directory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m interested to know how many of these sites you have listed with Yahoo and then not renewed without them removing you.</p>
<p>I mean, it would make sense to keep you if they want to have a big and relevant directory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

